# Action Map — Craft Dairy
> Kit 27 · Craft-Dairy Process Training · deliverable · designed and built by I Wayan Usada — instructional design portfolio · fictional composite
## Design premise
The action map is built from the (fictional) interview, not a competency library. Each operator action traces to a passage the founder says in 01; the designer action is the extraction itself.
## The goal (proposed, not measured)
Excursion batches are released with a complete deviation note, and no tank-line step is cleared on a surface cue.
## Actions that close the gap
| Action | Audience | Practice | Feedback | Trace |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classify interview passages and name the artifact each feeds | designer | 01: classify 10 passages | the kit's classification and why | the whole pipeline |
| Measure, don't inherit | operator | Gate 1: gauge vs. own probe + log | excursion math possible or not | passage 1 (the invented log) |
| Confirm the record, not the lamp | operator | Gate 2: lamp vs. cycle record | the cycle record's end-state | passages 2–3 (from memory, told once) |
| Trace the line, never the habit | operator | Gate 3: worn label vs. hand trace + allergen record | allergen risk named | passage 2 (routine steps) |
| Release with the note | operator | Gate 4 + note task | missing or non-record entries named | passages 6–7 (release call, the skipped note) |
## What is not a training problem
- Worn labels are a maintenance finding: replace them on a schedule, not only when someone notices.
- A probe that is "somewhere" is an equipment problem: one probe per station, on a hook.
- The CIP panel lamp could show "complete" only on a full end-state; that is a controls change for the supplier.
## Revision note
The map now separates the designer action from the operator actions and lists the non-training fixes. Scores are /10 (four gates plus the note); the evaluation on the case page is a proposed plan, nothing has been measured.