# Action Map — LMS Pulse
> Kit 20 · LMS Pulse · deliverable · designed and built by I Wayan Usada — instructional design portfolio · fictional composite
## The goal (proposed, not measured)
Quarterly learning reviews name which family of numbers tells each programme's story before choosing an intervention.
## What people do instead
React to the loudest tile (the top comment or completion), treat drop-off as a learning result, and prescribe before diagnosing.
## The actions that close the gap
| # | Behaviour | What it looks like | Where the artifact trains it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | **Sort the numbers into exposure, persistence and learning** | each tile is read for what it can and cannot say | stat labels; 3D tag, leaks and beaker |
| 2 | **Name the story before prescribing** | learning, persistence, measurement or healthy, chosen per cohort | diagnosis step; interventions locked until then |
| 3 | **Prescribe where the problem sits** | the two interventions act on the diagnosed part | 2-of-6 picks; 3D tokens pinned where they act |
## What is not a training problem
- If the LMS reports completion but no pre/post delta, the learning family is missing: that is a reporting fix.
- A post-test learners pass before the course (cohort C) needs an assessment owner, not a review habit.
## Revision note
"Drop-offs measure learning" corrected; four shared stories replace the two-option diagnosis; the "order matters" claim removed. Nothing has been measured.