Kit 24 · Roster Reset · deliverable · designed and built by I Wayan Usada · fictional training provider · the "AI" is scripted
Four weeks of trainer planning. Each week the model proposes a roster with a strong occupancy figure. Revised after the build so it matches the 2D planner and the 3D planning table; both read planner-data.js.
The earlier build stated each week's flaw in the week's own description ("Eindhoven is 90 minutes away"), so nothing had to be inspected. Now the description is only the proposal; the facts sit in four evidence objects.
| Week | Deciding evidence | Best | Correct edit | Flag scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34 · regional certificates | route: Venlo ends 12:00, Eindhoven starts 13:00, 90 min apart | Edit | give the Venlo Thursday practice to Sanne (87%) | yes (no travel-time data) |
| 36 · freelance load | contract: cap of 5, Tuesday study day | Edit | give the Tuesday session to Joris (88%) | no (data existed) |
| 38 · clean-looking week | rooms: soft booking, facilities can move it | Accept | (edit to B3 is harmless, scores 1) | no |
| 40 · three regional groups | history: 22% no-show after the same packing last year | Edit | move Weert to week 41 (90%) | yes (no history data) |
Decision: best 2, defensible 1 (override on an edit week; an edit with the wrong change; an unnecessary edit on week 38), wrong 0. Citing the deciding evidence 1. Flag on the two blind-spot weeks 1. Maximum 14. Pass = 11 or more, and never accept the impossible week-34 roster or the contract-breaking week-36 roster.
The earlier docs promised re-randomised weeks and copy-paste-reason detection; neither existed and both claims are removed. Reasons are now tied to evidence instead of word counts.
Prefer the source? Download the raw markdown.