lms-pulse · deliverable

Action Map — LMS Pulse

Kit 20 · LMS Pulse · deliverable · designed and built by I Wayan Usada — instructional design portfolio · fictional composite

The goal (proposed, not measured)

Quarterly learning reviews name which family of numbers tells each programme's story before choosing an intervention.

What people do instead

React to the loudest tile (the top comment or completion), treat drop-off as a learning result, and prescribe before diagnosing.

The actions that close the gap

#	Behaviour	What it looks like	Where the artifact trains it
1	Sort the numbers into exposure, persistence and learning	each tile is read for what it can and cannot say	stat labels; 3D tag, leaks and beaker
2	Name the story before prescribing	learning, persistence, measurement or healthy, chosen per cohort	diagnosis step; interventions locked until then
3	Prescribe where the problem sits	the two interventions act on the diagnosed part	2-of-6 picks; 3D tokens pinned where they act

What is not a training problem

If the LMS reports completion but no pre/post delta, the learning family is missing: that is a reporting fix.
A post-test learners pass before the course (cohort C) needs an assessment owner, not a review habit.

Revision note

"Drop-offs measure learning" corrected; four shared stories replace the two-option diagnosis; the "order matters" claim removed. Nothing has been measured.

Prefer the source? Download the raw markdown.